Daily Office: Monday

j0112.jpg

¶ Matins: Of all the outgoing Administrations that I have known, none has excited the prosecutorial zeal of its opponents as keenly as the current one. Bringing the Bush Administration to justice was the main topic in yesterday’s Week in Review section of the Times, with pieces by three visiting commentators and a remonstrance by Frank Rich. Something must be done.

¶ Lauds: The Golden Globes… The Carpetbagger reports.

¶ Prime: Sic transit. Quite a few of the blogs indexed at nycbloggers.com for my subway stop have closed up, or not featured a new entry in a year or two.

¶ Tierce: In a nice gesture, Bernard Madoff apologized to his fellow co-op owners at 133 East 64th Street: Sorry about that scrum of reporters at the door!

¶ Sext: I’ll say one thing for Joe the Plumber, currently “reporting” from Israel: he’s walking proof that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing — in front of a microphone, anyway. If people must be entitled to their opinions, then at least they ought to have the decency to acknowledge that their opinions are uneducated. (via Joe.My.God)

¶ Nones: Good news from Thailand: voters seem inclined to heal the urban/rural rift. Even more, the now-more-powerful government  won’t let itself get carried away.

¶ Vespers: Katherine Anne Porter (1890-1980) has achieved official immortality, in the form of a Library of America volume. The book appeared in September, but William H Gass just got round to discussing it.

¶ Compline: Let’s hope the same can never be said of Barack Obama: “After Receiving Phone Call From Olmert, Bush Ordered Rice To Abstain On Gaza Ceasefire Resolution.” Secretary Rice had carefully negotiated the wording of the resolution, only to have the rug pulled out from under her because of an imperative call from Israel.

Read the rest of this entry »

Weekend Update: Home Alone

dbwui.jpg

Kathleen’s doctor has advised her to try to escape the winter climate once a month, if she can, so she’s staying in Boca Raton a bit longer than necessary. The conference that brought her there started today, but she arrived on Friday afternoon, and she won’t leave until Wednesday.

In other words, I’m home alone. Unsupervised.

I was very good yesterday. I got up early, fixed breakfast, and got to work on the usual round of Saturday chores. I did a load of towels in the laundry — the dry cleaner can’t be made to wash them without fabric softener of some kind — and took down the Christmas wreath over the mantel. When I was done, shortly after six, the apartment looked not only neat but so well-groomed that the formidable Park Avenue matron that Lena Olin plays in The Reader wouldn’t sniff before sitting down. Not that we get a lot of Park Avenue matrons this far east.

I had a glass of wine or two with my spaghetti alla carbonara, but after dinner I zapped a mug of Lapsang Souchang and was constructive for an hour or two. Then I poured another glass and went out.  

Went out in a manner of speaking, that is, to the Webcam Tavern. I had a great time with a law school chum. How we laughed! It was very jolly. But then, suddenly, it was very late, and there were two empty wine bottles at my feet. Uh-oh.

I didn’t have to drive home, and I didn’t spend any money, either on wine or on phone bills. I don’t think I said anything too stupid. But I might as well have driven into a tree, lost my wallet (and the wad of cash in it), and irreparably insulted my old friend, considering how I felt about it all this morning. The worst thing about overindulgence nowadays is the intense remorse that grips me the next day. It is a moral hangover that I rarely experienced in my hard-drinking days. “I didn’t do anything,” I tell myself, but it’s not convincing, even when it’s true.

That I was fit only for reading today wasn’t cause for regret, because that’s what I do on Sunday. When I’m through with the Times (three days’ worth, usually), I read The Economist. Ordinarily, The Economist confers a fine patina of virtuousness, but not today. I couldn’t for the life of me figure out the drift of a story about the record-low nominal yields of Treasury bonds.

The physical hangover wasn’t so great either, but at least it was not one of those interfering maladies that makes fatal disease seem preferable (very preferable). I was able to make breakfast once again — and to order in lunch and dinner, and to eat it all with relish. But I couldn’t shake the feeling that I’m still a disappointing young man — at sixty-one!

Weekend Update: Reflection

j0110.jpg

Weekend Update: TGIF

j0109.jpg

And so we come to the first day of the weekend — Friday. That’s how we do things around here, anyway.

Four days of eight more or less significant links, each presented within the context of a given canonical hour — At Lauds, for example, I try to link to an interesting item about the Seven Lively Arts (books come in at Vespers) — is as much as I can do, and also, at least with my current astronomical equipment, about as far as I can see.

Now I’m off to the movies — to see The Reader.

Bon weekend à tous!

Daily Office: Thursday

j0108.jpg

¶ Matins: It’s as though everyone decided to spend the holidays pretending that things were fine: now that we’re back in the real world, the disasters just pile up like planes over O’Hare. “China Losing Taste for Debt From the U.S.

¶ Lauds: Once upon a time, the Germans copied the French: Imperial princelings replicated, to the extent that their incomes would allow, Louis XIV’s country house (and stealth capitol) at Versailles. Now the Germans have taken the initiative, and the French are just watching.

¶ Prime: The (only) good thing about Web log awards is the chance to discover sites that you haven’t heard about. I don’t remember the category in which I came across Dizzying Intellect — the categories are utterly spurious in any case — but it doesn’t matter, because I found it.

¶ Tierce: Too big to filch? Bernard Madoff has been making unauthorized distributions of assets, according to prosecutors. His attorneys claim that the Cartier watches are relatively inexpensive sentimental items that Mr Madoff would like his family to have. In the dictionary, under the word “chutzpah”…. Alex Berenson reports.

 ¶ Sext: The thing to note about developer Fred Milani — if you can get beyond the House — is that he is “not very political.” Exactly! No politically-minded person would erect a scaled-down adaptation — “replica” is not the word — of the “President’s House.” The politically-minded person would be interested only in the real thing. And that’s not all…

¶ Nones: Trying to find an update on the violence in Greece that the Times reported the other day — it’s coverage, dismayingly, is better than that of the English papers that I’ve checked, as well as the BBC’s — I discover that the Turkish government has rounded up a bunch of secularist critics and accused them of fomenting a plot. This story does come from the BBC.

¶ Vespers: I’ve done just about nothing today but read Brian Morton’s first novel, The Dylanist. Published in 1991, this is a novel to dust off and re-read in the Age of Obama, not so much for any specific political alignment as for its portraits of people who are too richly principled for cynicism.

Read the rest of this entry »

Daily Office: Wednesday

j0107.jpg

¶ Matins: Here’s hoping that no regular readers of The Daily Blague were under the illusion that the Cold War was “won” — and by US! Andrew Kramer reports on the cold Cold War.

¶ Lauds: The year in music: Steve Smith sums up 2008.

¶ Prime: The last thing you need is yet another blog to check out, but I’m afraid that you’ll have to make room on your list for Scouting New York — at least if you have any interest whatsoever in this burg of ours. The site is kept by a professional location scout — what a dream job! (There are no dream jobs, but we don’t have to know that.

¶ Tierce: A story that I’m afraid I was expecting to see: “State’s Unemployment System Buckles Under Surging Demand.” That the outage was repaired later the same day is not the point.

¶ Sext: Will nonbelievers spend eternity at the back of a bus? 800 London buses will begin bearing “atheist” messages, such as “There is probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.” Sarah Lyall reports.

¶ Nones: Oops! Another I-Lied accounting story, this one involving Satyam, the outsourcing firm that provides back-office services to “more than a third of the Fortune 500 companies.” Heather Timmons reports, with Bettina Wassner.

¶ Vespers: Don’t ask what has taken me so long, but I’ve gotten round at last to adding Koreanish to the blog roster. It is kept by novelist Alexander Chee, author of Edinburgh. Yesterday, he posted an entry from this years MLA convention in San Francisco.

¶ Compline: Stanley Fish lists his favorite American movies of all time. Of the ten, only Vertigo makes my list. I don’t begin to understand the appeal of John Wayne, and I could never omit Katharine Hepburn, Bette Davis, Cary Grant, or Fred Astaire, not to mention Preston Sturgis.

Read the rest of this entry »

In the Book Review: Rough Crossing

brj0104db.jpg

Liesl Schillinger’s excellent review of Louise Erdrich’s new collection of stories, The Red Convertible, almost makes up for the snark and condescension scattered through the rest of this week’s issue.

Greatest. Birthday. Ever.

adorablerjdb.jpg

My thanks to everyone who dropped by at my Facebook page today to wish me a happy birthday. I was as delighted as shown here, over sixty years ago.

Confucius says: “Is it not delightful to have friends coming from distant quarters?” Is it not, indeed!

Daily Office: Tuesday

j0106.jpg

¶ Matins: Mark my words: this is the beginning of something good: Web/House calls by physicians in Hawaii.

¶ Lauds: When I was growing up, art was something that fruity, suspect men couldn’t help producing — the  byproduct of diseased minds. The people around me wished that art would just stop. Even I can hardly believe how unleavened the world was in those days. How nice it would have been to have Denis Dutton’s new book come to the rescue: The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution.  

¶ Prime: My friend Jean Ruaud, who happens to be the best photographer I know, spent the holidays in Houston, the city where I lived for almost a decade but haven’t visted in seventeen years. Even though most of the pictures — all of the ones that don’t feature Downtown — are completely unfamiliar, they’re also distinctly More of the Same.  

¶ Tierce: It’s official.

For those New Yorkers who wondered what the Manhattan real estate market might be like without the ever-rising bonuses of Wall Street’s elite, the answer is now emerging: an abrupt decline in transactions, tottering prices and buyers who are still looking but unwilling to sign a contract.

Josh Barbanel reports.

¶ Sext: The reported discovery of a circle of standing stones forty feet below the surface of Lake Michigan is more than a little intriguing. Quite aside from what the site tells us about prehistoric society, there’s the matter of protecting the site. How do you restrict access to an underwater location? (via kottke.org)

¶ Nones: “Activists” have become “gunmen” in Greece. Anthee Carassava reports.

¶ Vespers: At Maud Newton, Chad Risen mourns the shuttering of the Nashville Scene book page. Hang-wringing news, certainly. I can’t say, though, that I agree with this:

Blogs are great, and in some ways better than book sections, but there’s nothing like a book page in a local, general-interest publication to “cross-pollinate” interest among people who might otherwise never come across serious discussions of the printed word.

This sounds like a paper fetish to me.

¶ Compline:There are two items about the Catholic Church in today’s Times, and although they seem to tell very different stories, I’m not so sure that they do. The first is Abby Goodnough’s report on “rebellious” parishioners who have occupied their church in order to keep the Boston diocese from selling it off. From Spain, meanwhile, Rachel Donadio writes about an impending showdown between observant Catholics and government secularists.

Read the rest of this entry »

Friday Movies: Last Chance Harvey

lastchanceharveydb.jpg

Last Chance Harvey is a “small” film that is going to have a very large number of very intense fans.

Daily Office: Monday

j0105.jpg

¶ Matins: What an upside-down world we are in, when Congressional Democrats bashfully support the Israeli attacks at Gaza but the Times dismisses them as “a dismal coda to the Bush administration’s second-term push for Middle East peace.”

¶ Lauds: Ever since Ghost Town, I’ve been a huge fan of Kristen Wiig. Knocked Up was the movie that ought to have taught me, but her role in that film — as the infamously snarky production assistant — struck me as just another Hollywood bitch. As a colonoscopist, however — well! Regular readers will know why I sat up and paid attention.

¶ Prime: Muscato strikes gold — or perhaps, since he always strikes gold, we ought to call it vermeil — with a collection of TV ads for Konsum, the konsumer emporium of the DDR. Who can resist ein tausend kleine Dinge? Don’t tune out before that starts. It could have been called New York Confidential.

¶ Tierce: How do you spell “Idiocracy”? A-r-p-a-i-o. David Carr writes about the showboating Arizona sheriff who may, one hopes, find his true calling as a reality-show fixture — and put a stop to his travesty of public service.

¶ Sext: The nice thing about the juggling LaSalle Brothers, currently wowing audiences at the Big Apple Circus, is that they give credit where credit is due.

According to Jake, the act is more about genetics than balance. “Juggling is such a difficult discipline to perfect,” he said. “You have to be so precise. There are very few good team juggling acts out there now. I think everyone has an individual internal rhythm.

“There’s a difference in internal rhythms,” he added. “With my brother, we’re exactly on the same page. When I watch other professional teams perform, it seems much more forced. There’s a fluency from our luck in being twins.”

¶ Nones: The post-mortem will be interesting, and resurrection oughtn’t to be ruled out; but Waterford Wedgwood has gone into “administration” — receivership. Among the many causes, there is a sad truth:

Waterford Wedgwood has suffered from falling demand for its high-quality crystal, china and other tableware, and has recorded a loss for the last five years.

¶ Vespers: Just when my bibliotechnical energy was failing, I encountered an encouraging entry at Anecdotal Evidence, where Patrick Kurp shares a poem by David Slavett.

“What will I re-read, or even consult?
Let us admit that, for all their heft on the shelves,
books are flighty, become souvenirs of themselves,
appealing no longer to intellect and taste
but playing to sentiment. Why else keep on hand
Look Homeward, Angel, except in the in the hope that the schoolboy
who turned its pages may show up some afternoon?”

¶ Compline: A proper dinner at our house ends not with dessert but with a reading from Harold McGee’s On Food And Cooking. One or the other of us wants to know why such-and-such a thing happens in the kitchen. Our curiosities — Kathleen’s and mine — have very different motivations. I usually want to know What Went Wrong. Kathleen, in contrast, wants to know How Things Work. These are two sides of the same coin, the flip being whether or not you actually spend any time in the kitchen making meals. Tonight, in a rare congruence, we both wanted to the skinny on how something works: the substance known, very unscientifically, as “cream of tartar.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Weekend Open Thread: Going Down

j0104.jpg

Weekend Update: The New Year So Far

dbwui.jpg

Having rung in yet another New Year — on New Year’s Day, for a change, not the night before — I thought I’d better get back on track with a Friday movie. I made a date on Thursday night to see Last Chance Harvey with LXIV, at a theatre just round the corner from his house. After tea and dolce with Kathleen, I got myself onto the IRT in plenty of time. On the ride downtown, I read about half of a terrific essay on video games by the English man of letters, John Lanchester, in the London Review of Books. Mr Lanchester points out (not in the same sentence) that the popular games combine all the tedium and effort of the workaday world with fantasy violence. I endeavor to bear in mind that my remarkable inaptitude at games — I have barely enough hand-eye coordination to operate an iPod — is no excuse for taking a condescending attitude toward Grand Theft Auto IV, but it’s no use.

I climbed out of the subway fifteen minutes before the appointed time. What to do? I could cross Union Square and browse at Barnes & Noble. Or — what’s this? A big Virgin sign hung at a corner a block away. A record store! I couldn’t believe that such a thing still existed. In fifteen minutes I could check the place out.

Like most stores that I’ve been in since Christmas, Virgin was close to empty, which only made its spotlighted lampblack interior look like a horror movie that nobody wanted to see. There were the usual undistinguished beats and jags of crashingly tedious noise, presumably intended to signify a locus of Dionysiac release even at this midday hour. It didn’t take long to find the serious music, downstairs. Jazz and the classics are collected in a large space beneath the entrance. Unless there was a pop-music department hidden away somewhere, I’d have to say that the days when serious music was shoehorned into the odd corner appear to be over. If I’d had more time, I’d have tested my theory that serious music will keep the CD manufacturers in business. Once again, I might add. I picked up Renée Fleming’s new-looking album of Schubert lieder, actually over ten years old. And “The Best of Cal Tjader/Live at the Monterey Jazz Festival 1958-1980.” Why not.

The Virgin store happens to sit beneath the Regal Union Square Theatre, which is where LXIV and I were to see Last Chance Harvey. Twenty yards from door to door. But because LXIV would be waiting at his apartment for my buzz, my route A to B took me in a clockwise direction, round the other way, down Fourth Avenue, across Thirteenth Street and up Broadway. We New Yorkers love walking so much that we don’t mind strolling around the block just to get back into the same building.

I will have more to say about Last Chance Harvey presently, but I can report that LXIV and I liked it very much. There were some rather shattering moments of muted humiliation for Dustin Hoffman’s character, and at first it seemed that Emma Thompson’s character was going to find him as annoying as everyone else did. Instead, Ms Thompson turned Last Chance Harvey into the first true romantic adventure story, one that asks if two dented, middle-aged people who know even less about one another than we know about them (not much!) crazy to give love a try?

Kathleen had been asked to join us for the movie, but she would commit only to lunch at the Knickerbocker Bar & Grill. It was her first visit to this University Place landmark, which I didn’t even know about until late last summer. Kathleen put her finger on why I’m crazy about it: the Knickerbocker is “like Schrafft’s.”

After lunch, Kathleen and I caught a taxi, and, as we drove uptown, Kathleen asked about University Place. Where does it start and where does it end? I could have thought about this a minute and essayed an answer, but it would probably have been wrong, so I reached for Manhattan Block By Block, which I carry everywhere, and established that University Place runs from the northeast corner of Washington Square (continuing from Washington Square East) to the southwest corner of Union Square, where it runs into Broadway. Unfortunately, trying to read the map in the back of the cramped taxi not only made me carsick but unleashed the hangover that had, until now, hung fire. I was not to feel entirely well for the rest of the day.

In the evening, Ms NOLA and M le Neveu stopped by, on their way to see Milk, up in our part of town. Kathleen was napping, so they came back after the movie, and we all had a good chat. Our talk came round to Broadway shows. Kathleen proposed getting tickets for the four of us to see the revival of Guys and Dolls, starring, among others, Lauren Graham — as Miss Adelaide! How counterintuitive is that? And wasn’t the show revived just a few years ago? With Nathan Lane and Faith Prince?

How about 1992? No! We couldn’t believe it. Sixteen years ago? But Ms NOLA remembered: in Manhattan Murder Mystery, somebody goes to see Guys and Dolls, and a bit of Googling confirmed her recollection. It seems like only — well, not yesterday, exactly. But 2002, say. In 2002, however Mr Lane was enjoying the Broadway triumph of The Producers. Strangely, that seems to have happened longer ago. As Alan Rich wrote of Le Nozze di Figaro about a million years ago, in New York Magazine, Guys and Dolls, like the Catholic Mass, ought to be celebrated somewhere around the world at every moment.

(Speaking of Nathan Lane, we often say, of an actor whom we particularly like, “Oh, I’d go to see her in anything! I’d pay to see her read the phone book!” Our bluff is about to be called. Mr Lane, together with Bill Irwin, David Strathairn, and John Goodman, will be giving a revival of Samuel Beckett’s Waiting For Godot in the spring.)

I may be back on track, but, as is the case every January, there is more of me to get up to speed.

Holiday Note: First Working Day

j0102.jpg

The new year has begun brilliantly at this end, with the first piece of misdirected email since I don’t know when. To a very nice guy whom I see at parties on Claremont Avenue, and who was kind enough to write a proper note after we connected at Facebook, I wrote,

Blah blah blah. Tell me something I don’t know.

XOXO (short for “toxic gas”)

rjk

Ooops! As anybody can tell, my message was meant for Fossil Darling, who had just insulted me (instead of thanking me for providing his useless and unloved existence with a warm and loving home-like atmosphere on New Year’s Day) by calling me a “vile and miserable being.” (Not even human being!) I don’t know if all the ‘splainin’ in the world is going to get me out of this one.

After Fossil and LXIV headed home last night, Kathleen and I hunkered down to watch The King and I closely — very closely. No elephant prod!

I’ll explain later. Happy New Year!

Holiday Note: Happy New Year!

j0101.jpg

This is an odd choice for a New Year’s image, I know; but there’s a warmth in the bogus colours that gives me the feeling that I’m about to be really well fed. 

I’m not a scholar of English country houses, but, with the passage of time, even Buck House seems less peculiar than Blenheim. Blenheim is beyond the English-country-house thing. It’s a (mini) Versailles waiting to be appreciated as such. Only a Queen (Anne) would have tolerated its construction. All the other Great Houses are the country seats of Whigs, but Blenheim, as the postcard says, is a “palace.” In that, it exceeds its original.

Daily Office: Wednesday

i1231.jpg

¶ Matins: Is English really the indispensable tongue of the Internet? Maybe not anymore.

¶ Sext: Don’t ask me where he finds the time, but our Joe gets around.

I had pondered actually going to Times Square tonight, until a dozen or so of my friends collectively threatened to have me committed.

Read the rest of this entry »

Daily Office: Tuesday

i1230.jpg

¶ Matins: Bubbles beget bubbles: the housing-price bubble appears to have inspired some pipe dreams of easy divorce that burst along with the market, at least according to John Leland’s report, “In Housing Fall, Breaking Up Is Harder to Do.”

¶ Tierce: The other day, Fossil Darling urged us to read one of Bob Herbert’s columns in the Times last week, “Stop Being Stupid.” I’ll have more to say about that anon, but I thought of it this morning — and hopefully, too — when I read Joe Sharkey’s “In Flight” column this morning. It would appear that Kip Hawley, the outgoing director of the Transportation Security Administration, has actually been learning on the job. I like heaps of scorn as much as anybody, at least if I’m doing the heaping; but the TSA is an organization that I would almost desperately like to praise.

¶ Nones: Now it’s the red shirts who are trying to gum up the Thai government. The new Prime Minister managed to make his maiden speech today, in a different venue. But taking to the streets in the colors of your party is tantamount to suiting up for civil war.

¶ Compline: Bob Herbert’s column today, “Add Up The Damage,” argues for some sort of formal condemnation of the Bush Administration’s attack on the Republic. I especially agree with Mr Herbert that the president “would give the wealthy and the powerful virtually everything they wanted. He would throw sand into the regulatory apparatus and help foster the most extreme income disparities since the years leading up to the Great Depression.” But I would refer Mr Herbert to his last Op-Ed piece, referenced earlier today. It’s more important to stop being stupid Americans than to punish the officials who were empowered by that stupidity.   Read the rest of this entry »

Reading Note: Shortcomings

tominei12.jpg

I’ve admired Adrian Tomine’s drawings in The New Yorker for years, but it was only recently that I gave a thought to reading one of his books. Which is to say one of his works of graphic fiction. I’m not sure that I know how to read graphic fiction yet, but at least I’ve begun to read it again. (The first couple of titles that I looked into, which will go nameless, bored me silly.) It’s much easier to figure out how to read something if you try reading it.

Is it still important to argue that a given work accomplishes things in the artist’s chosen medium that could not be achieved in any other? The question is particularly electric for graphic fiction because of its resemblance to the storyboard. I suppose that someday there will be an exhibit of Alfred Hitchcock’s famed storyboards (in which the sequence of important scenes was carefully laid out before shooting began), and we will ooh and ah not only at the Master’s wizardry but at the rich possibilities of a “neglected” format.

But storyboards are sketches that resolve themselves into a very different completed work (the film). At the same time they are not sketches in quite the same way that Raphael’s drawings are sketches. The validity, or the authenticity, or the what-am-I-looking-for? of graphic fiction depends upon its insolubility. The material would have to have some quality that could not be improved if it were pressed into either a novella or a film.

That’s the quality that I’m looking for. And I think I’ve brushed against it in Shortcomings. I won’t reproduce it here, but the last frame on page 28 (Miko regards Ben with tired reproach, but says nothing) almost stung me. In a film, the image would pass immediately.* No amount of text could capture Miko’s expression. So I’m getting something that I couldn’t get in another way.

All of which seems both precious and academic, given the wit of Mr Tomine’s characters. I don’t think I’d care to have the foregoing evaluated by Alice Kim!

* That I could go to the trouble of converting my favorite films into graphic novels is certainly interesting to think about. I expect that copyright law is the only thing that has kept rotoscopers from turning them out.

Daily Office: Monday

i1229.jpg

¶ Matins: The sickest thing about the United States today is undoubtedly the fact that prisons are a growth industry. The processing, so to speak, of prisoners newly minted by the nation’s preposterously discriminatory penal codes, can’t be outsourced to China, so failing rural towns try to rally by competing for prison contracts. Central Falls, Rhode Island, a town that combines plenty of illegal immigrants with plenty of cells in which to incarcerate them, lives in the shadow of what sounds, from Nina Bernstein’s story, like a Stalinist terror.

¶ Sext: In this morning’s Times, Susan Dominus writes up Chelsea Technologies, hitherto “a small operation that specializes in providing information technology services to hedge funds and small investment funds around the city.” And, now, to their former employees who have “wrapped things up” and are “looking for alternatives.” Which is French for: they’re out of work and need high-quality Internet access at home. There is a slightly snarky smile behind the placid surface of Ms Dominus’s report, but you won’t hear any chuckling from me — oh, no!

¶ Compline: Here’s a story that’s getting a lot of attention in the Blogosphere: Elisabeth Rosenthal’s “No Furnaces but Heat Aplenty in ‘Passive Houses’.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Weekend Update: Mrs Wilson

dbwui.jpg

This evening, I found an hour, between an afternoon of reading and the preparation of dinner, for getting started on Christmas cards. The tardiness is not, I’m afraid, uncharacteristic. Although I like to send cards at the normal time (before Christmas), that’s just one of those good-behavior impulses that so often interfere with the spirit of things. Terrified of being tired of the Yuletide season before 25 December, I quite often don’t get into the Christmas spirit until the day itself. I take “the twelve days of Christmas” very seriously: they begin on the Nativity and end on my birthday, which is only as it should be.

There also seems to be a temporal chute that gets more greasedly accelerated every year. One minute, it’s Columbus Day (second Monday in October). The next, it’s Beethoven’s birthday (16 December), and I haven’t given a thought to Christmas. That is, I’ve given a lot of thought to not giving a thought to Christmas. On or around Beethoven’s birthday — the date on which, in my Radio Days, I allowed the announcers to start filling out the hours with Christmas carols — I start thinking about Christmas. In a ducking position, mostly.

Reading John Lukacs’s “autobiographical study” of George F Kennan a few weeks ago, I was keenly aware of something that Mr Lukacs wasn’t addressing. While he praised his subject for the untiring composition of position papers, speeches, essays, histories, and generally weighty (though digestibly well-written) texts, all I could think about was what Kennan didn’t have to think about, viz: the laundry, breakfast, shopping, dinner, the dusting, shopping, lunch, sending Christmas cards, and so on. Kennan was lucky enough — there really is no other word, from my vantage — to live in a time when men, especially thoughtful, intelligent men, were expected — expected — to stick to the important stuff. Mr Lukacs does not discuss Kennan’s hobbies, if any, but it’s clear that they were never allowed to interfere with the man’s self-prescribed duties, for the simple reason that he had no wish that would let them interfere. He liked to work. That’s commendable. That he never troubled himself with having the draperies dry-cleaned is not even worth mentioning. Mr Lukacs has undoubtedly been similarly lucky himself.

It’s important to stress that I feel no resentment about having to run a household. It is not work that I dislike. I thrill every time I watch Gosford Park, not because of the aristocratical shenanigans but because the housekeeper played by Helen Mirren knows how to manage the bedlinens. But I’m aware that such concerns cut into loftier pursuits. Now that I’ve come to a point in my life at which it seems that I have a lot to think about, and a lot to say about it (however interesting or not to others), I wouldn’t complain if Mrs Wilson were to materialize in our home. (Not that we could afford her!)

Kathleen, who has such tremendous powers of concentration that she can finish a piece of work only to discover that her body has been sounding fire alarms about hunger and whatnot that must “suddenly” be addressed with the utmost urgency, advises me to relax and focus on the things that I want to do. In modern psychological parlance, she’s trying to get me to give myself permission to put off washing the windows. Her powers of concentration being what they are, she could live in the murk of an abandoned fishtank without thinking about the difference that a bit of Windex and some elbow grease might make. And as for Christmas cards, let me just ask those of you on our mailing list if you’ve gotten one from her since the Seventies.

Surely there’s an nth law of thermodynamics that holds that there can be but one Kennan in any household.