Archive for June, 2010

Must Mention:
4 June 2010

Friday, June 4th, 2010

havealookdb1

¶ Trading in Hungary’s largest commercial bank has been halted on the Budapest Exchange. (Zero Hedge)

¶ “What Are Farmer’s Markets For?” ( Good) And how about Corn-Flakes-Coated Chicken? (The Bygone Bureau)

While We’re Away

¶ The density of smart people. (The Atlantic; via 3 Quarks Daily)

¶ “Buffett’s PR Disaster“? Felix thinks so.

¶ Ten Over Eighty (Ward Six): Choire fumes; bucks younger rejects up with Affirmations. (The Awl)

¶ Reading about a 1920 gay witch-hunt at Harvard, it’s impossible not to feel good about social progress. (The Good Men Project; via Joe.My.God)

¶ Protestant Reformation –> Rock ‘n’ Roll. (JEH Smith; via 3 Quarks Daily)

Have a Look

¶ Saul Chernick (ARTCAT)

¶ The glory of good bones: Diana Mitford Mosley, with second husband and fourth son. (1904)

¶ Historypin. (Brain Pickings)

¶ Steve Martin, up close and personal. (Letters of Note)

Reading Note:
At the bottom of the garden

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

ddk0603

The pleasures of reading Barbara Pym’s A Glass of Blessings are simple but amply sustaining. There is the lapidary writing, marinated in understatement, and a corresponding tact: Pym has very clear ideas about what’s right, what’s wrong, and what’s funny, but she is determined to avoid communicating them directly to her readers, some of whom, she trusts, will share her outlook without having to be cued. (Those who don’t will either be bored, puzzled, or — the lucky ones — intrigued.) You know that you’re going to be a fan of Pym’s artistry if the following exchange elicits not a laugh but a broadening smile:

“I don’t like knitting,” I said.

“No, I despise women who are always knitting,” said Sybil. “But it can be a useful occupation — the kind of thing one can do when talking.”

“I wonder if women brought their knitting when Oscar Wilde talked,” said Piers.

“I daresay not,” said Sybil calmly, “but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t have liked to.”

There is the handsome figure of Wilmet Forsyth, the young married lady of modest leisure who narrates the book, along with the delightful suggestion that Wilmet is something of an unreliable narrator. It’s not that she has something to hide, but rather that she has something to learn. Her lesson is bound up in the poem that gives the book its title.

In George Herbert’s four-stanza, sixteen-line poem The Pulley, God pours the contents of a glass of blessings over newly-created man. Having bestowed strength, beauty, wisdom, honor, and pleasure, God holds back on the blessing at the bottom of the vessel, which is that of rest, so that the other virtues will be enjoyed “with repining restlessness.”

Let him be rich and weary, that at least;
If goodness lead him not, yet weariness
                 May toss him to my breast.

Wilmet Forsyth does not repine, but she is restless, and the novel opens with a double-barreled temptation. At church one morning, she spies the brother of her best friend, an interesting disappointment called Piers. Then, after the service, she learns that a new assistant priest will be arriving soon. Ingenuously unaware of the dangers to her heart as well as to her respectability, Wilmet dallies flounderingly with both men. As it happens, they’re both, while fond of her — fond perhaps because she is married and unattainable — interested in other people. At the end of the novel, Wilmet realizes that her life is indeed as blessed as it can be. (That her staid-seeming husband, Rodney, has also found his attentions wandering serves to strengthen the marriage, but it also helps that his mother, Sybil, decides to remarry, and to reclaim her house for herself, forcing the young couple to do what they ought to have done at the start.)

There is the pleasure of Pym’s ecclesiastical comedy. Three sorts of players occupy this uniquely English stage: the high-church clergymen, addressed as “Father,” the respectable ladies of the parish who expect the clergymen to remain celibate, and the laymen who bring to the more elaborate liturgies an expertise that savors more of military competence and commercial savvy than of spiritual piety. It is an utterly worldly church that is, pre-eminently, the hub of its parishioners’ lives, which unspool not in some charming county village but in what seems to be Bayswater. It might strike today’s reader as odd that a moderately fashionable and respectable young married woman, without children, plans her life around morning mass and parish receptions, but it would be a mistake to suppose that Wilmet is less religious than the churchgoers around her. Almost as though the Reformation had never happened, these people regard the church as a fount of meaning and familiarity. They have little interest in the doctrinal underpinnings, and rather expect the church to act as a buffer that protects the everyday from the transcendent.

There is also the pleasure of watching a lady novelist handle gay life candidly, at a time when homosexual acts were proscribed in England, and to do it without resorting to any simplifying terminology. When Wilmet divines that Keith, Piers’ beautiful but socially inferior flatmate, is more than a friend, she absorbs the blow to her vanity without a drop of nasty moralizing. 

I got into the taxi and we waved goodbye. I could not imagine Piers going back to the house, climbing the stairs, perhaps sitting down heavily in an armchair, letting out an exaggerated sigh, while Keith’s flat little voice began discussing me, criticizing my clothes and manner. I felt battered and somehow rather foolish, very different from the carefree girl who had set out across the park to meet Piers. But I was not a girl. I was a married woman, and if I felt wretched it was no more than I deserved for having let my thoughts stray to another man. And the ironical thing was that it was Keith, that rather absurd little figure, who had brought about the change I thought I had noticed in Piers and which I had attributed to my own charms and loving care!

Also rather gay is Wilfrid Bason, a reject from Rodney’s office who serves the parish priests as a housekeeper for a while. He’s a very sophisticated cook, but he’s also something of a thief — at least, he likes to borrow other people’s pretty things. That’s the extent of Bason’s outrageousness, but given this novel’s mild climate, he fairly screams his way through it. Pym shows him off as a ridiculous person, but without the faintest suggestion that he’s representative of his team.

Finally, there is the benediction of Pym’s great good nature. In a conventional novel, the following passage might adorn the expository beginnings, but in A Glass of Blessings it works rather more like a climax.

I tried to make myself useful but there was very little for me to do. The weather was glorious, but it seemed wanton to be lying in a deckchair in the mornings while Mary was arranging things for the coming retreat, so I took an upright canvas chair, or sat on a hard wooden seat of the kind that looks as if it might have been given in memory of someone. I half expected to see an inscription carved on the back. The only task Mary could find for me was to pick and shell some peas for lunch, and to put the pods on the compost heap under the apple trees at the bottom of the garden. Here, in a kind of greenish twilight, stood a pile of grass cuttings and garden rubbish, and as I added my pods to it I imagined all this richness decaying in the earth and new life springing out of it. Marvell’s lines went jingling through my head.

My vegetable love should grow
Vaster than Empires and more slow….

There seemed to be a pagan air about this part of the garden, as if Pan — I imagined him with Keith’s face — might at any moment come peering through the leaves. The birds were tame and cheeky, and seemed larger than usual; they came bumping and swooping down, peering at me with their bright insolent eyes, their chirpings louder and more piercing than I had ever heard them. I wondered if people who came here for retreats ever penetrated to this part of the garden. i could imagine the unmarried mothers and the schoolboys here, but not those who were striving to have the right kind of thoughts. Then I noticed that beyond the apple trees there was a group of beehives, and I remembered the old saying about telling things to bees. It seemed that they might be regarded as a kind of primitive confessional.

I went slowly back to the lawn, but to a deckchair now; the hard wooden seat seemed out of keeping with my mood.

Must Mention:
3 June 2010

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

havealookdb1

¶ Singing “Michelle” to Michelle. (BBC News)

While We’re Away

¶ Using IT to make Ho Chi Minh City’s traffic a little less awful — proposed. (The Infrastructurist)

¶ Twenty Under Forty. (That left Eggers and Whitehead out.) (NYT)

Have a Look

¶ We could live here! (NYT)

Reading the Feeds:
Elites and Entrepreneurs

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

ddk0602

A word or two about Tyler Cowen’s recent entry at Marginal Revolution, “When does large-scale public ownership work?” The butt of this piece is a compare-and-contrast of the cultures of China and France on the one hand and of the United States on the other. Here is what Americans do not share with the French and the Chinese:

In part this is a puzzle but in part France and China have one important feature in common: it’s high status to be a ruler. Very smart Frenchmen often grow up wanting to work for the government. Hardly anyone in France thinks that is weird and so the French bureaucracy has some of the best talent in the country.

Americans get carried away by sentimental patriotism as eagerly as any buch of guys, but their love of country is pallid compared with what France and China inspire in their nationals: both countries are “middle kingdoms,” central sovereignties habituated to setting broad cultural standards and to solving regional problems in terms of sheer chthonic majesty. (Whether either France or China is “entitled” to this drastically superior self-image is, here, beside the point.) In both countries, being Chinese/French is a civil project that’s at least as important as any other that the government might foster (defense, industry). No wonder, then, that smart and ambitious graduates find civil service to be a top-drawer careeer.

The relationship between “being American” and the American government is starkly opposite: the government’s only task is to stay out of the way of Americans’ self-realization. Fervently patriotic Americans are like the appreciative children of very permissive parents: their taste for freedom cannot be exaggerated. And where once the canonical image of the free American was the cowboy, now it is the entrepreneur. Mr Cowen doesn’t use the word in his entry, but he carves out a space that only it could fill.

I also prefer to live in a society where the public sector does not have so much prestige. Very often governmental prestige stifles innovation and implies a series of more general insider, elitist, and sometimes authoritarian attitudes. It’s also worth a quick look at the histories of what France and China had to do to build up so much governmental prestige; not pretty.

My sympathies are altogether opposed to these sentiments; it will always be a matter of the deepest regret that I did not contrive to live my life in a society that exalted the public sector above all others. I believe that entrepreneurs are of rather marginal importance in a society as complex as ours, and even if they’re ten times more important than I think they are, they’re no model for the rest orf us. While I would not call myself an “elitist,” I will not deny or try to hide the fact that I was born, by whatever accidents, into the American elite and that I have spent my entire life in that atmosphere. Mr Cowen certainly does so now, whatever his origins. The odds are very strong that you yourself, the reader, are a member of the American elite.

What’s great about France and China — and wretched about Anglophone civilization — is that elite groups do not hypocritically pretend that they do not enjoy great advantages — the sort of advantages that will accrue to people at or near the levers of power so long as human beings walk on two legs. I don’t know that French or Chinese elites are qualitatively more responsible to their cultures than privileged Americans are, but at least they’re not vacuously pretending that they’re not Old Etonians.

Must Mention:
2 June 2010

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

havealookdb1

¶ Al and Tipper. (Everywhere, but we’ve stuck with the Times)

¶ Israel and the flotilla: a range of opinions, all aggregated at Real Clear World. ¶

While We’re Away

¶ Books with hyperlinks! Well, a new edition of a Jules Verne classic, anyway — all you need is a smartphone. (Chron Higher Ed; via Marginal Revolution)

¶ Universal language instinct? Not so much. (New Scientist)

¶ On the counterproductivity of incentives. (The Frontal Cortex)

Have a Look

¶ Pants Fail.

Dear Diary: Bananas

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

k0601

This was supposed to be an entry about Tyler Cowen’s ideas about entrepreneurial regulators (he doesn’t like them), but circumstances required my presence at a long (and enoyable; not complaining) business dinner, as a result of which I am no longer fit to write about abstractions.

Will ate his first bit of solid food today — mashed banana — and we were all immensely impressed. The first few teaspoonfuls he interrupted with a lot of wishful spoonholding, but he was quick to realize that keeping his hands out of the way guaranteed the passage of sweet fruit into his mouth. Will took to spoon feeding so quickly, in fact, that we wondered if he hadn’t rather sweetly but impatiently been waiting for it for days, if not weeks.

If you know a grandfather as besotted with his grandson’s achievements as I am with my own’s, I hope that you will introduce us to one another.

Must Mention:
1 June 2010

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

havealookdb1

¶ Deepwater Horizon: the nuclear option. (The Oil Drum)

¶ Getting Slapp-ed at Facebook. (NYT)

While We’re Away

¶ Against “apps.” (The Baseline Scenario)

¶ Reversing Santa Clara County: the 28th Amendment movement. (Chelsea Green; via reddit)

¶ The best short take on Marilyn Monroe’s “scenius.” (Happy Birthday! You’d be 84!) (Hilowbrow)

¶ The Permanence Matters Initiative — a hardbound book ought to last a long time. (The Millions)

¶ Negroni Season! (The Awl)

Have a Look

¶ God’s throat, man’s brain: Michelangelo anatomizes in plain sight. (Scientific American; via 3 Quarks Daily)